Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: LUPINO ARMCHAIRS AND SWIVEL ARMCHAIR (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Reference year 2023
Name
LUPINO ARMCHAIRS AND SWIVEL ARMCHAIR
Technical purpose of product or process Characterised by an organic design language and sporty charms – this seating shell armchair, available with two different backrest heights, reflects the dynamics of our time. Fresh, agile and somewhat cheeky. Offering a high level of individualisation through a fascinating number of options. PRODUCT DESCRIPTION Frame armchairs LUPINO Frame versions: 4L - powder coated or chromium plated steel four legs CFS - powder coated or chromium plated steel sled legs LFW - varnished soil wood four legs SWIVEL - powder coated or polished aluminium base with gas lift Castors/Glides: plastic, for hard or soft surfaces Shell: upholstered, plywood construction covered with polyurethane foam Leg rest LUPINO Frame versions: SWIVEL - powder coated or polished aluminium base with gas lift Castor/Glides: plastic, for hard or soft surfaces Shell: upholstered, plywood construction covered with polyurethane foam CERTIFICATES Test report APPLICATIONS Conference rooms, meeting rooms, public areas and as visitor armchair in workplaces All specific product technical data is available at manufacturer website (https://www.nowystyl.com/en/kush-co-office).
General comment on data set The data selected for LCA analysis originate from ITB-LCI questionnaires completed by Nowy Styl Sp. z o.o. using the inventory data, ITB and Ecoinvent databases. No specific data collected is older than five years and no generic datasets used are older than ten years. The representativeness, completeness, reliability, and consistency are judged as good. The allocation rules used for this EPD are based on general ITB-PCR A v. 1.6. Production line process carried out in four factories of Nowy Styl sp. z o.o. located in Krosno and Rzepedz (Poland). Allocation was done on product mass basis. All impacts from raw materials extraction are allocated in A1 module of the LCA. 100% of impacts from the line production of Nowy Styl sp. z o.o. were inventoried. Utilization of packaging material was taken into consideration. Module A2 includes transport of raw materials such as wood-faced boards, wood, polymer components, steel elements, papers, additives, ancillary materials and packaging materials from their suppliers to Nowy Styl sp. z o.o. in Jaslo and in Rzepedz. Municipal wastes of factory were allocated to module A3. Energy supply was inventoried for whole factory and was allocated to the production. Emissions in the factory are measured and were allocated to module A3. The life cycle analysis of the declared products covers “Product Stage”, A1-A3, C1, C2, C3, C4 and D modules (Cradle-to-Gate with options) accordance with ISO 14040 and PCR A v.1.6. The details of systems limits are provided in product technical report. Energy and water consumption, emissions as well as information on generated wastes were inventoried and were included in the calculations. It can be assumed that the total sum of omitted processes does not exceed 5% of all impact categories. In accordance with ITB PCR A v. 1.6., machines and facilities (capital goods) required for the production as well as transportation of employees were not included in LCA.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 0.0 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2028
Technological representativeness

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Raw material supply
A1
 Transport
A2
 Manufacturing
A3
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 446
  • 0.021
  • 3.06E+3
  • 0.0541
  • 0.000193
  • 0.089
  • 0.00136
  • -103
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 661
  • 0.991
  • 1.88E+3
  • 0.789
  • 0.0135
  • 16.1
  • 0.0903
  • -198
Input
  • 4.74
  • 0.000511
  • 0.588
  • 0
  • 0.00000452
  • 0.000153
  • 0.0000194
  • 8.27
Input
  • 4.96
  • 0.0000061
  • 0.0029
  • 0
  • 4.98E-8
  • 0.00000267
  • 0.00055
  • 21.3
Input
  • 50.1
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.76
Input
  • 0.851
  • 0.000161
  • 1.73
  • 0.000242
  • 0.0000017
  • 0.000727
  • 0.000105
  • -0.0612
Output
  • 8.4
  • 0.00155
  • 2.75
  • 1.54E-7
  • 0.0000151
  • 0.0186
  • 0.0000898
  • -0.123
Output
  • 31.6
  • 0.0285
  • 50.2
  • 0.0044
  • 0.000269
  • 0.532
  • 0.0176
  • -5
Output
  • 0.00844
  • 0.00000666
  • 0.00166
  • 6.38E-7
  • 1.01E-9
  • 0.000104
  • 6.06E-7
  • -0.000179
Output
  • 0.0326
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.152
  • 0.00000394
  • 35.7
  • 0
  • 4.17E-8
  • 0.00428
  • 1.65E-7
  • 0.324
Output
  • 0.00995
  • 3.05E-8
  • 7.44
  • 0
  • 3.37E-10
  • 8.37E-9
  • 2.11E-9
  • -9.72E-7
Output
  • 36.7
  • 0.00137
  • 2.92
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.63
  • 0.0000936
  • 0.12
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
 Transport
A2
 Manufacturing
A3
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 9E+2
  • 0.991
  • 1.8E+3
  • 0.745
  • 0.0135
  • 14.9
  • 0.0903
  • -183
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.00125
  • 4.18E-7
  • 0.00028
  • 6.59E-8
  • 3.22E-9
  • 6.29E-7
  • 6.85E-9
  • 0.000192
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.243
  • 0.000265
  • 2.5
  • 0.000484
  • 0.00000369
  • 0.00566
  • 0.0000296
  • -0.0202
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.00000288
  • 1.48E-8
  • 0.0000152
  • 8.75E-10
  • 2.1E-10
  • 2.36E-7
  • 1.36E-9
  • -5.61E-7
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.0171
  • 0.00000648
  • 0.145
  • 0.0000829
  • 6.1E-8
  • 0.0000491
  • 2.59E-7
  • -0.00903
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.0511
  • 0.0000732
  • 0.617
  • 0.0000688
  • 0.00000111
  • 0.00222
  • 0.000018
  • -0.00393
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.415
  • 0.000797
  • 9.28
  • 0.00059
  • 0.0000121
  • 0.0242
  • 0.000117
  • -0.0473
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -6.51
  • 0.000339
  • 7.2
  • 0.00088
  • 0.0000031
  • 0.29
  • 0.0000199
  • 1.19
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 38.4
  • 0.0678
  • 127
  • 0.0488
  • 0.000908
  • 1.41
  • 0.00534
  • -10.4
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.137
  • 0.0000397
  • 0.466
  • 0.0000115
  • 3.56E-7
  • 0.000117
  • 0.00000195
  • -0.0688
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 32.1
  • 0.0682
  • 135
  • 0.0497
  • 0.000912
  • 1.7
  • 0.00536
  • -9.28
Global warming potential except emissions and uptake of biogenic carbon (GWP-IOBC/GHG)
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.158
  • 0.000249
  • 1.7
  • 0.000166
  • 0.00000372
  • 0.0068
  • 0.0000343
  • -0.014
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 49.3
  • 0.00606
  • 66
  • 0.0151
  • 0.0000623
  • 0.067
  • 0.00033
  • -12.5

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
 Transport
A2
 Manufacturing
A3
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0