Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Steel structures and steel structure components (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location PL
Geographical representativeness description -
Reference year 2023
Name
Steel structures and steel structure components
Use advice for data set The life cycle analysis of the declared products covers “Product Stage” A1-A3, A4-A5, C1-C4+D modules in accordance with EN 15804 and ITB PCR A (cradle to gate with options). Energy and water consumption, emissions as well as information on generated wastes were inventoried and were included in the calculation. It can be assumed that the total sum of omitted processes does not exceed 5% of all impact categories. In accordance with EN 15804+A2, machines and facilities (capital goods) required for the production as well as transportation of employees were not included in LCA.
Technical purpose of product or process Valmont Polska Sp. z o. o. at the plant in Siedlce produces steel lighting, signaling, tram and power poles and high masts The production process is partially automated and is based on the acceptance of metallurgical materials for production (steel coils or steel sheets) and then cold processing of steel (unwinding, cutting, bending). The shaped elements are welded longitudinally by one of the following three methods, depending on the technological process: ? SAW (submerged arc welding) – submerged arc welding, ? PAW (plasma arc welding) – plasma welding, ? ERW (electric resistance welding) – electric resistance welding. The structure is finished in black, including welding of the base and accessories, using MIG-MAG welding and mechanical methods - cutting, grinding, burning. The products are protected against corrosion by hot-dip galvanizing in external galvanizing plants, and can optionally be powder coated or hydrodynamically coated in external painting shops. The steel columns covered by this EPD are manufactured in several conicities made out of hot-rolled steel sheet with few thicknesses and grades based on customer requirements and local norms. The product range is presented in the product catalogue and is described in terms of material, shape, height, taper, together with the conditions of use (passive safety).Depending on the type, the pole is circular or octagonal in cross-section. -
General comment on data set The data selected for LCA originate from ITB-LCI questionnaires completed by Valmont Polska Sp.z o.o. and verified during data audit. No data collected is older than five years and no genericdatasets used are older than ten years. The representativeness, completeness, reliability, andconsistency is judged as good. The background data for the processes come from the followingresources database Ecoinvent v.3.9.1 (steel, welding, paints, polyester, polyethylene terephthalateproduction, EUR-flat pallet, structural timber). Specific (LCI) data quality analysis was a part of theinput data verification. Where no background data was available, data gaps were complemented bymanufacturer information and literature research. The allocation rules used for this EPD are based on general ITB’s document PCR A. Production of the covered steel products is a line process (as presented in Figure 1) conducted in the manufacturing plant located in Siedlce (Poland). Input and output data from the production is inventoried and allocated to the production on the mass basis. The declaration covers a wide range of steel products. Their production resources and processing stages are basicly similar, so it is possible to average the production by product weight. The production process carried out at another company's plant is galvanizing and optional special coating, which was included in the calculations. Minimum 99.0% input materials and 100% energy consumption (electricity, gas, LPG, other) were inventoried in a processing plant and were included in the calculation. In the assessment, all significant parameters from gathered production data are considered, i.e. all material used per formulation, utilized thermal energy, and electric power consumption, direct production waste and available emission measurements. Tires consumption for transport was not considered. Substances with a percentage share of less than 0.1% of total mass were excluded from the calculations. The packaging products (wooden pallets) are included. Modules A5, B1-B5 are not assessed. In B1-B5, only marginal maintenance is required.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 1.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 1.0 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2028
Time representativeness description "2023-11-17" - "2028-11-17"
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system -

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 1.38E+3
  • 65.6
  • 729
  • 17.7
  • 0.0593
  • 8.9
  • 4.69
  • 8.9
  • 0.15
  • -565
Input
  • 4E+2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1.78E+3
  • 65.6
  • 729
  • 17.7
  • 0.0593
  • 8.9
  • 4.69
  • 8.9
  • 0.15
  • -565
Input
  • 2.86E+4
  • 3.04E+3
  • 7.29E+3
  • 1.23E+3
  • 0.721
  • 108
  • 327
  • 108
  • 17.3
  • -6.48E+3
Input
  • 2.14E+3
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 3.08E+4
  • 3.04E+3
  • 7.29E+3
  • 1.23E+3
  • 0.721
  • 108
  • 327
  • 108
  • 17.3
  • -6.48E+3
Input
  • 4.5E+2
  • 1.6
  • 0.175
  • 0.414
  • 0.0000627
  • 0.0094
  • 0.11
  • 0.0094
  • 0.00364
  • 988
Input
  • 1.01
  • 0.0192
  • 0.000756
  • 0.00456
  • 3.16E-7
  • 0.0000475
  • 0.00121
  • 0.0000475
  • 0.0000951
  • -0.142
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 8.25
  • 0.501
  • 10.3
  • 0.155
  • 0.00207
  • 0.311
  • 0.0411
  • 0.311
  • 0.019
  • -5.83
Output
  • 12.2
  • 4.82
  • 18.4
  • 1.38
  • 0.00559
  • 0.838
  • 0.367
  • 0.838
  • 0.0184
  • -0.0819
Output
  • 1E+3
  • 88.9
  • 933
  • 24.6
  • 0.376
  • 56.5
  • 6.51
  • 56.5
  • 0.259
  • -119
Output
  • 0.0244
  • 0.000334
  • 0.0226
  • 0.0000921
  • 1.08E-7
  • 0.0000162
  • 0.0000244
  • 0.0000162
  • 0.000115
  • -0.0131
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.109
  • 0.0123
  • 1.1E+3
  • 0.00382
  • 0.00000484
  • 0.000726
  • 0.00101
  • 0.000726
  • 0.0000347
  • 0
Output
  • 0.00209
  • 0.0000945
  • 0.0000181
  • 0.0000309
  • 7.78E-9
  • 0.00000117
  • 0.00000818
  • 0.00000117
  • 4.11E-7
  • 0
Output
  • 18.3
  • 0
  • 5.4
  • 0
  • 0.00231
  • 0.346
  • 0
  • 0.346
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 2.89E+4
  • 3.04E+3
  • 6.91E+3
  • 1.23E+3
  • 0.721
  • 108
  • 327
  • 108
  • 17.3
  • -6.75E+3
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.0188
  • 0.00132
  • 0.135
  • 0.000295
  • 1.72E-8
  • 0.00000258
  • 0.000078
  • 0.00000258
  • 0.00000145
  • -0.0154
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 6.11
  • 0.81
  • 30.5
  • 0.337
  • 0.000483
  • 0.0725
  • 0.0893
  • 0.0725
  • 0.00594
  • -3.24
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.000965
  • 0.0000454
  • 0.000041
  • 0.0000192
  • 2.51E-10
  • 3.77E-8
  • 0.00000509
  • 3.77E-8
  • 2.56E-7
  • -0.0000291
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.584
  • 0.0203
  • 0.579
  • 0.00559
  • 0.0000787
  • 0.0118
  • 0.00148
  • 0.0118
  • 0.0000589
  • -0.349
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 1.26
  • 0.223
  • 1.47
  • 0.102
  • 0.0000684
  • 0.0103
  • 0.027
  • 0.0103
  • 0.00207
  • -0.71
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 13.4
  • 0.223
  • 1.2E+2
  • 1.11
  • 0.000597
  • 0.0895
  • 0.294
  • 0.0895
  • 0.0226
  • -7.73
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -65.4
  • 1.06
  • 13.7
  • 0.284
  • 0.000123
  • 0.0185
  • 0.0752
  • 0.0185
  • 0.00161
  • 2.85
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 1.84E+3
  • 208
  • 425
  • 83.1
  • 0.0469
  • 7.04
  • 22
  • 7.04
  • 0.632
  • -816
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.994
  • 0.124
  • 0.729
  • 0.0326
  • 0.00000714
  • 0.00107
  • 0.00864
  • 0.00107
  • 0.000597
  • -0.0596
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 1.77E+3
  • 209
  • 4.4E+2
  • 83.4
  • 0.0469
  • 7.04
  • 22.1
  • 7.04
  • 0.634
  • -813
Global warming potential except emissions and uptake of biogenic carbon (GWP-IOBC/GHG)
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 6.02
  • 0.757
  • 2.12
  • 0.34
  • 0.000172
  • 0.0257
  • 0.0901
  • 0.0257
  • 0.00658
  • -4.08
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 593
  • 18.8
  • 337
  • 5.7
  • 0.0138
  • 2.07
  • 1.51
  • 2.07
  • 0.055
  • -116

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0