Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: K40 CABINETS, CADDIES, ORGATOWERS, CONTAINERS (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Reference year 2023
Name
K40 CABINETS, CADDIES, ORGATOWERS, CONTAINERS
Technical purpose of product or process With K40 everything finds its place, completely flexible and yet precisely tailored to the needs and requirements of users, the storage concept is versatile and masters any organizational challenge. The large number of possible combinations of different cabinet versions offers optimum use of space. PRODUCT DESCRIPTION Cabinets and upper cabinets K40 CARCASS: Melamine faced chipboard SHELVES: Melamine faced chipboard or steel FRONT TYPES: Open, Hinged door, Slide door, Tambour door, Drawer, Hanging file drawer Pedestals K40 PEDESTAL TYPES: Fixed, Mobile CARCASS: Melamine faced chipboard FRONT TYPES: Pencil tray, Drawer, Hanging file drawer Orga Towers K40 ORGA TOWER TYPES: Free-standing CARCASS: Melamine faced chipboard FRONT TYPES: Drawer Caddies K40 CADDY TYPES: Mobile CARCASS: Melamine faced chipboard DOOR TYPES: Tambour CERTIFICATES GS Mark, Blue Angel, FEMB LEVEL APPLICATIONS Office Workstations All specific product technical data is available at manufacturer website (https://www.nowystyl.com/en/).
General comment on data set The data selected for LCA analysis originate from ITB-LCI questionnaires completed by Nowy Styl Sp. z o.o. using the inventory data, ITB and Ecoinvent databases. No specific data collected is older than five years and no generic datasets used are older than ten years. The representativeness, completeness, reliability, and consistency are judged as good. The allocation rules used for this EPD are based on general ITB-PCR A v. 1.6. Production line process carried out in four factories of Nowy Styl sp. z o.o. located in Krosno and Rzepedz (Poland). Allocation was done on product mass basis. All impacts from raw materials extraction are allocated in A1 module of the LCA. 100% of impacts from the line production of Nowy Styl sp. z o.o. were inventoried. Utilization of packaging material was taken into consideration. Module A2 includes transport of raw materials such as wood-faced boards, wood, polymer components, steel elements, papers, additives, ancillary materials and packaging materials from their suppliers to Nowy Styl sp. z o.o. in Jaslo and in Rzepedz. Municipal wastes of factory were allocated to module A3. Energy supply was inventoried for whole factory and was allocated to the production. Emissions in the factory are measured and were allocated to module A3. The life cycle analysis of the declared products covers “Product Stage”, A1-A3, C1, C2, C3, C4 and D modules (Cradle-to-Gate with options) accordance with ISO 14040 and PCR A v.1.6. The details of systems limits are provided in product technical report. Energy and water consumption, emissions as well as information on generated wastes were inventoried and were included in the calculations. It can be assumed that the total sum of omitted processes does not exceed 5% of all impact categories. In accordance with ITB PCR A v. 1.6., machines and facilities (capital goods) required for the production as well as transportation of employees were not included in LCA.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): ND kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: ND kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2028
Technological representativeness

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 355
  • 0.0482
  • 41.3
  • 0.0541
  • 0.000502
  • 0.166
  • 0.00317
  • -218
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1.41E+3
  • 2.29
  • 632
  • 0.789
  • 0.035
  • 29.9
  • 0.243
  • -532
Input
  • 38.8
  • 0.00117
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0000117
  • 0.000318
  • 0.0000519
  • 0.157
Input
  • 0.177
  • 0.000014
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.29E-7
  • 0.00000552
  • 0.00124
  • 38.8
Input
  • 1.07E+3
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.21
Input
  • 3.27
  • 0.000371
  • 0.237
  • 0.000242
  • 0.0000044
  • 0.00145
  • 0.000277
  • -0.131
Output
  • 7.21
  • 0.00355
  • 0.0619
  • 1.54E-7
  • 0.0000393
  • 0.0385
  • 0.000243
  • -0.251
Output
  • 12.9
  • 0.0654
  • 3.99
  • 0.0044
  • 0.000697
  • 1.1
  • 0.04
  • -10.3
Output
  • 0.00113
  • 0.0000154
  • 0.000494
  • 6.38E-7
  • 2.61E-9
  • 0.000193
  • 0.00000162
  • -0.000365
Output
  • 0.00106
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.00562
  • 0.00000907
  • 29.4
  • 0
  • 1.08E-7
  • 0.00883
  • 4.57E-7
  • 0.587
Output
  • 0.000348
  • 7.01E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8.76E-10
  • 1.73E-8
  • 5.59E-9
  • -0.00000198
Output
  • 7.08
  • 0.00316
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.37
  • 0.000175
  • 0.332
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.781
  • 0.000169
  • 0.0529
  • 0.0000688
  • 0.00000289
  • 0.00412
  • 0.0000453
  • -0.0128
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.00000492
  • 3.42E-8
  • 8.66E-7
  • 8.75E-10
  • 5.45E-10
  • 4.37E-7
  • 3.63E-9
  • -0.00000186
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 3.56
  • 0.000574
  • 0.128
  • 0.000166
  • 0.00000965
  • 0.0126
  • 0.0000924
  • -0.0384
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.162
  • 0.0000149
  • 0.0632
  • 0.0000829
  • 1.58E-7
  • 0.0000942
  • 7.39E-7
  • -0.0216
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -41
  • 0.000778
  • 0.671
  • 0.00088
  • 0.00000806
  • 0.598
  • 0.0000442
  • 1.93
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.132
  • 0.0000912
  • 0.00882
  • 0.0000115
  • 9.25E-7
  • 0.000218
  • 0.00000625
  • -0.238
Global warming potential except emissions and uptake of biogenic carbon (GWP-IOBC/GHG)
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 1.41E+3
  • 2.29
  • 595
  • 0.745
  • 0.035
  • 27.6
  • 0.243
  • -479
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 41.7
  • 0.156
  • 39.1
  • 0.0488
  • 0.00236
  • 2.69
  • 0.0136
  • -26.7
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.000385
  • 9.59E-7
  • 0.0000516
  • 6.59E-8
  • 8.36E-9
  • 0.00000118
  • 1.91E-8
  • 0.000715
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 3.9E+2
  • 0.0139
  • 11.6
  • 0.0151
  • 0.000162
  • 0.13
  • 0.000852
  • -42.5
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 0.732
  • 0.157
  • 39.8
  • 0.0497
  • 0.00237
  • 3.29
  • 0.0136
  • -25
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 8.2
  • 0.00184
  • 0.454
  • 0.00059
  • 0.0000315
  • 0.0448
  • 0.000315
  • -0.136
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 2.47
  • 0.000611
  • 0.371
  • 0.000484
  • 0.00000957
  • 0.0105
  • 0.0000807
  • -0.0529

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0