Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Aluminum luminaires family ALTEZZO, BARIS, INDUSTRY, LINEA, PLASTER LITE FUTURE (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location PL
Geographical representativeness description -
Reference year 2025
Name
Aluminum luminaires family ALTEZZO, BARIS, INDUSTRY, LINEA, PLASTER LITE FUTURE
Use advice for data set The life cycle analysis of the declared products covers “Product Stage” A1-A5, B6, C1-C4+D modules in accordance with EN 15804+2 and ITB PCR A (cradle to gate with options). Energy and water consumption, emissions as well as information on generated wastes were inventoried and were included in the calculation. It can be assumed that the total sum of omitted processes does not exceed 2% of all impact categories. In accordance with EN 15804+A2, machines and facilities (capital goods) required for the production as well as transportation of employees were not included in LCA.
Technical purpose of product or process EPD covers aluminum luminaires family: ALTEZZO, BARIS, INDUSTRY, LINEA, PLASTER LITE FUTURE products manufactured by Lena Lighting S.A. at Sroda Wielkopolska. All additional technical information about the product is available on the manufacturer's website and catalogues. -
General comment on data set The data selected for LCA originate from ITB-LCI questionnaires completed by producer. No specific data collected is older than five years and no generic datasets used are older than ten years. The representativeness, completeness, reliability, and consistency are judged as good. The background data for the processes come from the following resources: database Ecoinvent v.3.11 and KOBIZE (Polish electricity mix and combustion factors for fuels). KOBIZE data is supplemented with Ecoinvent data on the national electricity mix impact where no specific indicator data is provided. Specific (LCI) data quality analysis was a part of the input data verification. The time related quality of the data used is valid (5 years). The allocation rules used for this EPD are based on general ITB’s document PCR A. In the aggregated module A1-A3, material losses in the assembly of the producs in the factory are defined on the averaged specific values for the site.Input and output data from the production is inventoried and allocated to the production on the mass basis. The declaration covers a wide range of products. Their production resources and processing stages are basicly similar, so it is possible to average the production by product weigh so production is averaged for all products. Avoided burden approach is applied in the use of recycled and/or secondary raw materials, as well as loads and benefits beyond the system boundary from material recycling. No loads and benefits beyond the system boundary from energy recovery from the end of life of the product or packaging is included. In the assessment, all available data from production have been considered, i.e. all raw materials/elements used as per assembly process, utilized thermal energy, and electric power consumption. Thus material and energy flows contributing less than 1 % of mass or energy have been considered. It can be assumed that the total sum of neglected processes does not exceed 2 % of energy usage and mass per module A, B, C or D. Machines and facilities required during production are neglected. The production of etiquettes, tape and glue was also not considered.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 1.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 1.0 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2030
Time representativeness description "2025-10-30" - "2030-10-30"
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system -

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
 Transport
A4
 Installation
A5
 Operational energy use
B6
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.115
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6.06
  • 1.96
  • -4.67
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.251
  • 0.0000827
  • 0.0000053
  • 0.34
  • 0.0000053
  • 0.0000414
  • 0.0000245
  • 0.00000601
  • -0.0162
Input
  • 0.0399
  • 9.11E-7
  • 2.95E-8
  • 0.00176
  • 2.95E-8
  • 4.56E-7
  • 3.32E-7
  • 1.24E-7
  • -0.00129
Input
  • 0.00743
  • 0
  • 0.000047
  • 5
  • 0.000047
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -0.000499
Input
  • 0.157
  • 0.000031
  • 0.0000158
  • 3.72
  • 0.0000158
  • 0.0000155
  • 0.0000479
  • -0.000177
  • -0.0377
Output
  • 1.36
  • 0.000277
  • 6E-7
  • 15.4
  • 6E-7
  • 0.000138
  • 3.88E-9
  • 0.0000297
  • -0.236
Output
  • 22.7
  • 0.00492
  • 0.0000312
  • 1E+3
  • 0.0000312
  • 0.00246
  • 0.0102
  • 0.248
  • -5.56
Output
  • 0.000472
  • 1.84E-8
  • 4.35E-8
  • 0.00681
  • 4.35E-8
  • 9.21E-9
  • 2.89E-7
  • 5.1E-8
  • -0.245
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.00643
  • 7.64E-7
  • 6E-8
  • 0.0319
  • 6E-8
  • 3.82E-7
  • 3.61E-7
  • 2.25E-7
  • -0.1
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
 Transport
A4
 Installation
A5
 Operational energy use
B6
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 80.3
  • 0.247
  • 0.058
  • 4.44E+3
  • 0.058
  • 0.123
  • 0.0541
  • 0.0197
  • -34.1
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.00861
  • 5.89E-8
  • 1.67E-8
  • 0.000497
  • 1.67E-8
  • 2.95E-8
  • 1.29E-8
  • 1.86E-9
  • -0.000299
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 2.37
  • 0.0000675
  • 0.000038
  • 1.06
  • 0.000038
  • 0.0000337
  • 0.00658
  • 0.00000646
  • -0.264
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 6.89E-7
  • 3.85E-9
  • 7E-11
  • 0.0000101
  • 7E-11
  • 1.92E-9
  • 0.697
  • 1.21E-10
  • -1.38E-7
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -0.11
  • 0.0000568
  • 0.0001
  • 25
  • 0.0001
  • 0.0000284
  • 0.121
  • 0.00000494
  • -0.0225
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 12.3
  • 0.0166
  • 3.43
  • 207
  • 3.43
  • 0.00831
  • 0.34
  • 0.00625
  • -2.91
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.525
  • 0.00000652
  • 0.0000012
  • 0.479
  • 0.0000012
  • 0.00000326
  • 0.000009
  • 5.69E-7
  • -0.574
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 12.7
  • 0.0167
  • 3.43
  • 233
  • 3.43
  • 0.00834
  • 0.461
  • 0.00626
  • -3.5
Global warming potential except emissions and uptake of biogenic carbon (GWP-IOBC/GHG)
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.088
  • 0.000068
  • 0.000013
  • 0.473
  • 0.000013
  • 0.000034
  • 0.00934
  • 0.00000979
  • -0.00944
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 6.49
  • 0.00114
  • 0.0012
  • 118
  • 0.0012
  • 0.00057
  • 0.00446
  • 0.0000819
  • -1.44

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
 Transport
A4
 Installation
A5
 Operational energy use
B6
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0