Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: DECORA SPC FLOOR WITH ACULAY ACOUSTIC LAYER (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Reference year 2023
Name
DECORA SPC FLOOR WITH ACULAY ACOUSTIC LAYER
Use advice for data set The life cycle analysis of the declared product covers “Product Stage” A1-A3, C1-C4+D modules in accordance with EN 15804 and ITB PCR A (cradle to gate with options).
Technical purpose of product or process This Type III Environmental Declaration covers products from the DECORA SPC FLOOR WITH ACULAY ACOUSTIC LAYER group. The SPC floor coverings covered by this environmental declaration are waterproof floors representing a new generation of SPC (stone-plastic composite) with an integrated underlay, guaranteeing elegance and exceptional acoustic comfort thanks to Aculay technology, for use in residential and commercial spaces. The core of SPC floor coverings is made of PVC, chalk and recycled materials, combined with an acoustic underlay made of XPS, finished with a decorative layer and covered with high-quality UV varnish. The products are manufactured in two thicknesses (Table 1). All products are fully tested in accordance with EN standards. All specific product technical data is available at manufacturer website.(https://decora.pl/) Products manufactured by Decora.
General comment on data set The values determined to calculate A1-A3 originate from verified process LCI inventory data form production plant. A1 values for inputs (PVC, Chalk, were prepared considering input products characteristics based on Eco invent data. The energy consumption of production and its impact on the production lines were separately inventoried and calculated. In accordance with Annex E of the EN 15804 + A2, a data quality assessment was performed with a quality level of " good". The allocation rules used for this EPD are based on general ITB PCR A. The EPD is representative for all SPC products (production impacts are allocated the same way, mass based). Allocation covers 100% of production. In collaborative processes (all products), e.g. energy consumption for a production hall or offices, impacts were allocated on the basis of total mass allocation. Minimum 99.5% input materials and 100% energy consumption (electricity, gas) were inventoried in manufacturing plant and were included in the calculation. In the assessment, all significant parameters from gathered production data are considered, i.e. all material used per formulation, utilized thermal energy, and electric power consumption, direct production waste and available emission measurements. Tires consumption for transport was not taken into account. Limited number of substances with a percentage share of less than 0.1% of total mass might be excluded from the calculations. It is assumed that the total sum of omitted processes does not exceed 1% of all impact categories. Wooden packaging products are excluded in the analysis (considered as closed loop products). In accordance with EN 15804 machines and facilities required for and during production are excluded, as is transportation of employees.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): ND kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: ND kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2028
Technological representativeness

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 11.4
  • 0.961
  • 3.8
  • 0.563
  • 0.0326
  • 0.277
  • 0.014
  • -3.5
Input
  • 2.83
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 14.3
  • 0.961
  • 3.8
  • 0.563
  • 0.0326
  • 0.277
  • 0.014
  • -3.53
Input
  • 113
  • 44.6
  • 51.3
  • 7.62
  • 2.27
  • -174
  • 0.861
  • -55.1
Input
  • 62.6
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 175
  • 0
  • -35.2
Input
  • 179
  • 44.6
  • 53.4
  • 7.62
  • 2.27
  • 0.86
  • 0.861
  • -103
Input
  • 1.96
  • 0.0235
  • 0.00499
  • 0.000694
  • 0.000762
  • 0.00412
  • 0
  • -0.0164
Input
  • 0.121
  • 0.000281
  • 0.0000265
  • 0.00000387
  • 0.0000084
  • 0.0000535
  • 0
  • -0.000162
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0414
  • 0.00615
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.0305
  • 0.00735
  • 0.0223
  • 0.00206
  • 0.000286
  • 0.00149
  • 0.000124
  • -0.0353
Output
  • 0.203
  • 0.0706
  • 0.00998
  • 0.0000786
  • 0.00255
  • 0.0156
  • 0.00000125
  • -0.127
Output
  • 8.98
  • 1.3
  • 0.0662
  • 0.00409
  • 0.0453
  • 0.25
  • 3.28
  • -5.01
Output
  • 0.000147
  • 0.000151
  • 0.000039
  • 0.0000057
  • 1.7E-7
  • 0.00000567
  • 0.00000484
  • -0.0000694
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.00239
  • 0.000179
  • 0.84
  • 0.00000786
  • 0.00000704
  • 1.48
  • 0
  • -0.0013
Output
  • 0.0000293
  • 0.00000207
  • 0.00125
  • 6.88E-8
  • 5.69E-8
  • 4.21E-7
  • 0
  • -0.00000382
Output
  • 0.149
  • 4.91E-9
  • 0.152
  • 0.0227
  • 0
  • 1.91
  • 0
  • -0.0531
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 179
  • 44.6
  • 53
  • 7.6
  • 2.27
  • 0.86
  • 0.796
  • -102
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.0411
  • 0.0119
  • 0.0336
  • 0.00498
  • 0.000621
  • 0.183
  • 0.000291
  • -0.0197
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.0131
  • 0.00182
  • 0.00107
  • 0.000157
  • 0.0000601
  • 0.000128
  • 0.0000349
  • -0.00402
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 4.7
  • 0.276
  • 1.06
  • 0.157
  • 0.0105
  • 0.168
  • 0.00462
  • -1.96
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.000342
  • 0.0000192
  • 0.0000148
  • 0.00000219
  • 5.43E-7
  • 0.00000164
  • 1.17E-7
  • -0.0000491
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.00233
  • 0.000297
  • 0.00574
  • 0.000851
  • 0.0000103
  • 0.0000231
  • 0.00001
  • -0.00119
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 7.61
  • 3.06
  • 3.25
  • 0.457
  • 0.154
  • 8.95
  • 0.0348
  • -4.96
Global warming potential except emissions and uptake of biogenic carbon (GWP-IOBC/GHG)
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
No records found.
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.00737
  • 0.00327
  • 0.00489
  • 0.00072
  • 0.000188
  • 0.0985
  • 0.0001
  • -0.00405
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 7.91
  • 3.05
  • 3.16
  • 0.448
  • 0.153
  • 8.94
  • 0.0345
  • -4.94
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -0.307
  • 0.0155
  • 0.0886
  • 0.0131
  • 0.000523
  • 0.00477
  • 0.000348
  • -0.0166
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.0751
  • 0.00343
  • 0.0413
  • 0.00609
  • 0.00205
  • 1.05
  • 0.00109
  • -0.0404
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.0305
  • 0.0112
  • 0.0116
  • 0.0017
  • 0.000627
  • 0.26
  • 0.000316
  • -0.0146
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.00000146
  • 6.65E-7
  • 7.53E-8
  • 9.17E-9
  • 3.54E-8
  • 0.0000013
  • 1.05E-8
  • -0.0000018

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0